Showing posts with label Social Media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social Media. Show all posts

Thursday, February 26, 2026

Go Outside & Play

“Time, time, time. …See what’s become of me when I looked around for my possibilities?” – Paul Simon

OH, Chicken Scratch… Please forgive me. I have neglected you. You became a place for me to briefly check in and scream at injustices that weren’t fit for polite company. I stepped away, but it certainly wasn’t because I’ve stopped writing. No, perish the thought. I have enough to fill a book on COVID and a book on cancer alone! No. I believe that my lack of participation here is that my attentions have been diverted due to my participation in social media. Due to the good and the bad that such participations have wrought. I saw a bright, shiny thing and I ran after it. I’m still running for it… No, that’s not accurate; it’s more akin to a light jog or a casual walk these days.

I would like to make amends. I look at this blog sheepishly. It is dated and of a different time. The majority of Chicken Scratch has not aged well. Case in point, one of my favorite segments, the Blue-ray Dossier, was made completely obsolete with the advent of streaming which took over several years ago. I have not paid attention to Chicken Scratch and instead I have invested time and energy into other electronic distractions. I held out a long-time concerning politics and religion but circumstances since 2016 have made such banality an impossible task – especially with the advent of social media and all of it’s pomp & circumstance.

So, what does one do? I mean, the genie is out of the bottle. There is no going back, right? The fact is we love our conveniences and the things that please us. There are no atlases or maps in my vehicle any longer because I use Google Maps and all the give and take that comes with it. Sure, I can get from point A to point B more efficiently, free from tolls & traffic, but I am not the only one who is concerned with my trip to point B. Nope, moment by moment my phone is being monitored. Oh, yours it to and, deep down, I believe we know this. The fact of the matter is, we don’t care anymore. This isn’t tin-foil hat territory any longer. It hasn’t been for quite some time. Have you ever had a brief conversation with someone within earshot of your TV or cell phone only to discover that the next time you’re on Facebook advertisers are actively trying to sell you the content of your conversation back to you – be it goods, services, or ideologies both political & religious?

So, what can be done? What is a healthy balance between using technology responsibly and living in an off-grid cave in the woods? I believe we need to rethink how we approach social media. We need to realize that there is no such thing as anonymity online any longer and that words still mean things (in some quarters). Social media should not be your journal or diary. You can use it as such but just understand that each of your keystrokes are being recorded somewhere, your opinions are being documented, your likes & dislikes are being honed to sell you something (at best) or to oppress you (at worst). Money & manipulation are the names of the game. If we can accept that premise, then we can start to take back a little bit or ourselves and not completely surrender to the algorithm. Think before you type. Pretend that your keyboard isn’t anonymous – like you are having a conversation in public. If you can do that, you’re ahead of the game.

Results may vary and I am still very much a work in progress, but I find that I am happier without corporate media’s 24/7 controlled ‘news’ cycle, doomscrolling, and the ideological battles that keyboard warriors – both worthy & unworthy alike wage their battles. The time one spends on social media is YOUR time. If you wish to fill it with rage & frustration, by all means, read and respond to the comments section. No thanks. The algorithm has painted us all into where the data that AI has collected says we should be. Then there are the soulless Bots employed by would-be oppressors to contend with, as well. No, you can keep your comments section. There’s a 50/50 chance you’re not unloading on a human (rational or otherwise) anyway. I truly feel that we need a mass movement of re-humanization. A moment of self-reflection where we evaluate our place in the digital landscape. Does the time you spend on social media bring you joy? If not, perhaps it’s time to step away from the keyboard for a spell.

Read a book.

Take a walk.

Learn how to cook.

Volunteer somewhere.

Whatever you choose to do to keep yourself sane, do that instead. I am old enough to remember a time before data aggregation when the net was open and free. In days of yore the BBS boards gave way to America Online, which yielded to My Space, which in turn yielded to Facebook and then Twitter. Everything was so bright and shiny and there was a bit of a learning curve. The early days of Facebook were the salad years of social media. Then came the data aggregation companies who became brokers of personal information around the globe. But as is the case with many advancements our technology has far outpaced our ability to accurately assess its true price – what it does to us both psychologically & sociologically. We, the end users of any social media platform, are the commodity. The price of participating is revealing everything about yourself to the algorithm.

Back in the early days it was a fun way to connect with people over the internet. Back from kindergarten playground chums to souls you have never physically met from around the world, a connection was being made. Good times. Then the learning curve flattened out, and the electronic population of social media quadrupled. Advertisers, corporations, municipalities, & governments (local, national, & international) took notice of how people, for a shot of dopamine, would reveal themselves to the world. The algorithm doesn’t simply suggest advertisers to you anymore, now it reports back to whomever wants to pay the price for your information – and this whomever was never your friend. As a matter of fact, this whomever is now monitoring you for how you think, behave, believe and the tools we thought were toys are now the chains that are being held by those who desperately wish to exploit and oppress and rule over you. Yes, your algorithm has been weaponized against us and will continue to be if we do not start to control ourselves and what we project into the electronic world for everything you do on your phone or on your laptop is monitored and scrutinized by people who wish to manipulate or control you just to sell you something - either material goods or services or agendas and ideologies.

Way back in 2013 I wrote a blog, Whistleblowers & the Prophesies of the Dark Knight. I was proud of this one. I see how naive it was now. Our ability as a species to properly keep pace with the emerging technology verses our rate of absorption at the cost of said technology is a problem. That blog entry has not stood the test of time due to the fact that mass surveillance is no longer behind closed doors but is before your screen be it on your phone, laptop, or TV as soon as you hit that “I Agree” button when you sign up anything you wish to do on the computer. It does not take a team of data aggregators to see that your electronic footprint, stretching as far back as possible, can and will be used against you. Your thoughts have been weaponized - yes, even the half-baked ones that you typed into a terminal back in 2013.

"So, what do I do?"

Be discerning. Practice the words you tell others you believe - you know the ones, "Do unto others as you would have done unto you." Tell the truth. Try to be on the right side of history and when the political nightmares and abuses you see in the news come crashing through your door to steal you away as you have seen others stolen away you can stand in the light of the truth. Brutality and dominion have always existed but so have kindness and freedom. The pendulum swings eternally. So, when the weight of world's ills is pressing down upon you from everything that your algorithm belches onto your social media feed what can you do? 

If all else fails, block 'em. It's your time, after all. It doesn't have to be personal, perhaps you don't want a steady diet of "Factor X" on your feed. Take it back. Try to remember that you originally came to social media for fun and if your feed on any platform - Facebook, X, Bluesky, Instagram, WHATEVER begins to resemble a cavalcade conspiracies, lies, & overt political manipulation, drop it like it's hot. I have had to do so. Some cases I have had pangs of regret but most of the time it has been for the absolute best. Social media has, after all, provided ample opportunity for people to share their thoughts, feelings, & beliefs and if you are bringing nothing but hatred, lies, & racism to my feed - you've got to go. For the most part I came to social media for positive, progressive, & pleasant intentions. It's my time and it is precious. If you are not a monster we can be acquaintances or friends in real life, but if your online presence clashes with the intentions of which I came to social media for originally (or if you are a monster), then you can do so on your own feed without me.

Stand up for kindness and freedom and step away from the keyboard.

Read a book.

Take a walk.

Learn how to cook.

Volunteer somewhere.

Whatever helps in tapping down the insanities all around us. Evil men will do what evil men do. They have better tools these days, but so do we. Take back those pieces of yourself that have not already been categorized and cataloged. Write your own narrative and do not be manipulated into serving the algorithm and having it think for you. The sad truth is that people make money that can be traded for power when our information is used against us and the human animal does not always listen to the brighter angels of our nature.

Good luck, gentle reader. We are all works in progress. While I am attempting to re-humanize I am on social media less. 

I am happier for it. 

Perhaps you would be too.


 


Thursday, March 14, 2019

The 10 Films That Influenced You Challenge


True confessions.  These past 10 days have been agonizing.

“Why?”

Because there has been a challenge on social media, primarily Facebook, concerning one of my favorite things—film.  Oh, it starts simple enough, "The rules are, once a day, for ten days, post an iconic image from a film that influenced you... with no explanation necessary... feel free to join in if you would like..."  That's how it all starts.

The challenge is to post, “an iconic image from a film that [has] influenced you…with no explanation necessary”.  This challenge still lingers, which is why I had to post it right here on Chicken Scratch.  This has been agonizing for three solid reasons: 1., gathering ONLY 10 films that have an influence, 2., narrowing one’s scope to one image that fits the film, and 3., not explaining why.  I’ve been meticulous in this process.  I even set up a specific file for images, pondered films, and asked myself why these films—in particular, had such an impact on yours truly.  Meticulous, I say!  I, could not—in good conscience, let it rest…   


NOTE: if you don’t care about movies—or, more specifically, my choices of iconic films—move along.  No harm—no foul.  I’ll see you next post or so.  Thanks for stopping by.

Now then, fellow film geeks, here’s the explanation & the honorable mentions…


Day 1: “Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea”, 1954.  This movie blew my young mind.  It was released 14 years before I was born but it runs deep.  The Nautilus was my introduction to steampunk and the mysterious Captain Nemo—his motivations & character (which are fully realized in the book by Jules Verne) captured my imagination & attention.  Brilliant stuff.



Day 2: “Airplane!”, 1980.  I’m not saying it’s the most quotable movie of all time, but I’m not saying it’s not either.  This makes me laugh.  Laugh hard.  Still.



Day 3: “Raiders of the Lost Ark”, 1981.  Pound for pound, a perfect film.  Adventure, excitement—all the things that Jedi do not crave are in abundance surrounding the exploits of Indiana Jones.  I like the sequels—in fact number 5 is slated to be in the theaters in 2020, but there will NEVER be another Raiders of the Lost Ark.



Day 4: “Blade Runner”, 1982.  There are so many layers to this film.  At first glance it’s a futuristic noir detective story—however, the more one looks at this one the more one will see.  This film is an exploration into what life is, it’s precious nature, and who gets to say what is deemed to have a soul or not.  This one runs deep.  Mary Shelley, the mother of Frankenstein, would approve.



Day 5: “JAWS”, 1975.  JAWS horrified a generation of filmgoers, me included.  I was scared to get into the bathtub after seeing JAWS.  The scene on the Orca (Quint’s boat) when Robert Shaw/Quint is talking about the Indianapolis—one of the finest character driven scenes ever put to film.  ‘Bruce the Shark’, kept breaking down so Spielberg was able to keep the genie in the bottle until seeing the shark was the most impactful.  It’s a heck of a film that can make yellow barrels being drug along the water’s surface so terrifyingly menacing.  Brilliant stuff.



Day 6: “The Road Warrior” or “Mad Max 2” if you were not seeing it in the United States back in 1981.  This film strummed all the right chords for me.  It’s a western set in a post-apocalyptic future where the cowboys ride V-8 Interceptors & motorcycles instead of horses.  Max, a lone figure from the wastelands, comes to save the day.  Shane would be proud.



Day 7: “Superman – The Movie”, 1978.  “You will believe a man can fly”, was the tagline.  Even after all these years, Christopher Reeve’s performance as the Man of Steel still has me believing.  When Clark first introduces Superman to the world, ripping open his shirt—revealing the “S” on his chest, saving Lois, and the crowd below from the falling helicopter—chills.  Even now.  Seminal stuff.



Day 8: “Escape from New York”, 1981.  I love John Carpenter. He had a distinct style and it was a style that I lapped up. The pairing of Kurt Russell and Carpenter produced some of my all-time favorite movies.  This one introduced, for my money, one of the absolute best anti-heroes of cinema—Snake Plissken.  It took me a long time to find the right image for this one.  I settled for Snake in Hauk’s office holding up his bound hands, with the American flag in the background.  It is just before he delivers the line, “Call me, Snake”, for the first time and just before he tells Hauk, “I don’t give a fuck about your war—or your president.”  Hell yeah.  Every now and again there are rumbles about a remake.  I hope it doesn’t happen—not while Russell & Carpenter still have time to make Old Man Snake.  …To the gods of film, make this happen.



Day 9: “Planet of the Apes”, 1968.  This one scared me.  I came to it after it’s release since I was born the same year it was released.  I remember getting caught sneaking into our living room to get a glimpse of the sanitized, edited for TV version, when it came to the small screen.  I was not allowed to see it.  This was probably a good call since that what I saw disturbed me—especially since I can remember at that time hearing about guerrilla wars on the evening news.  My young mind couldn’t recognize the difference between guerrilla and gorilla, so my, ‘Planet of the Apes’, horror was compounded by my own ignorance.  The stark beauty of POA is that, hidden under a thin veil of ‘science fiction’, the story pokes holes into so many tropes of our institutions—religion, government, authority, control, freedom, anti-intellectualism.  It’s from the sixties but the messages are eternal.  It still holds up. It still has things to tell us. …And then, there’s THAT ending.



Day 10: “Star Wars – A New Hope”, 1977.  This hit my generation right between the eyes.  The image I chose for this one is Luke, gazing at the setting twin-suns of Tatooine, wondering about what the future may hold for him.  He has no idea at this point—no idea, whatsoever, that he will spark a revolution that rocks the seat of power in the galaxy. No, not yet—he’s just another soul looking at the suns set, wondering about tomorrow.  Luke, at that moment, represented each audience member sitting in that theater in ’77, at one point or another in our lives—staring into that uncertain future.  Would our futures involve going to Alderaan, learning the ways of the Force, and becoming a Jedi like our father—perhaps, even, helping to overthrow an evil galactic Empire?  One never knows.  As influences go, this one was—and is, seismographic in scope.  This one changed me.  No exaggeration.  Star Wars inspired wonder and made me want to tell stories—to write—to dream.  I’m not alone in this sentiment.  Countless other storytellers were touched by this space-opera homage to Saturday afternoon serials, Samurai movies, and westerns.  They still are.  The Force is still working.    

And then there’s the honorable mentions… 

“Treasure Island” with Wallace Beery as Long John Silver in 1934

 “King Kong” 1933 

“Frankenstein” 1931

“Conan – The Barbarian” 1982—which could have easily made the top 10

“Star Trek II – The Wrath of Kahn” 1982—which is STILL the greatest Star Trek movie to date 

“Goldfinger” 1965

“Moby Dick” 1956 – with a screenplay written by Ray Bradbury 

“A Fist Full of Dollars” 1964 

“Caddyshack” 1980 

“Big Trouble in Little China” 1986– another one from Carpenter & Russell that is STILL ahead of it’s time…

I could go on, but I should probably end this here…

The agony is too great to go on.




  

Sunday, June 23, 2013

Whistleblowing & the Prophecies of The Dark Knight


“I'd like to apologize to the schizophrenic rambling half naked homeless guy outside Wendy’s. Turns out you were right about the government.” – An observant man from Twitter named, Ben, commenting very effectively on the events of June 6th, 2013.

(SPOILERS)

Do you remember the end of “The Dark Knight” when Lucius Fox tells Bruce Wayne when he taps into everyone’s cell phone in Gotham so that Batman and that Bat-Sonar-Computer of his can see everything that is going on in the city and he tells Bruce, “No one should have that much power.” – When Batman saves the day he gives Lucius the choice to keep the tech or to blow it all up – trusting Lucius to do the right thing whatever that may be? 

“No one should have that much power.”

Lucius does the right thing and after the Joker is vanquished he destroys the computer.  Within the scope of the story he saves Bruce by doing so, as well.  Bruce knows that he would use the technology for what he would truly believe is a good cause but he also knows his own heart and, even with the best of intentions, how corruptible a human heart can be.  Bruce, in the end, does the very best he can do by handing the decision over to the only man he knew he could trust – the true hero of the story, Lucius Fox.  In the world of fiction it all made sense the good guys won, the bad lost and the credits rolled.  The specter of absolute power corrupting absolutely is averted and Bruce can keep fighting bad guys without becoming one in the sequel. 

(END SPOILERS – by the way, see “The Dark Knight” already, will ya?) 

In reality we find that proactive security and governmental monitoring just a bit too tempting.  On June 6th, 2013, the story broke that the United States government is collecting vast amounts of information from private communications.  It appears that it may be too idealistic to simply expect the government – ANY government to do the right thing on the issue of rights, security, & decency online is simply an idyllic model.  So why would Bruce Wayne, the Batman, build such a machine in the first place?  Alfred sums it up best when he says that, “Some men just want to watch the world burn.”   

Who knew that The Dark Knight would be so prophetic?  Maybe Christopher Nolan?

That is why.  The world is a dangerous place filled with people who only want to lie, kill & destroy and with a healthy combination of vigilance and fear we boldly step into a brave new era.  A world where surveillance on citizens of the United States is done in the name of safety and of security – power and control; a surveillance society.  Yes it is a, “different world” but the roots of our surveillance society go back further than we think.  In the article, “Privacy in Retreat, a Timeline”, NPR’s, Charles Mahtesian traces privacy’s decline back to the invention of, “the cookie” back in 1994.  It includes other greatest hits to personal freedoms and writes such as 2002’s, “Total Information Awareness” and 2005’s, “Warrantless Surveillance”.  You can watch the forward motion of this right here: http://www.npr.org/2013/06/11/190721205/privacy-in-retreat-a-timeline?sc=tw&cc=share.  In another article from NPR, “Privacy Past & Present: A Saga of American Ambivalence”, the writers under the subheading Privacy Past & Present have this quote from, “…Neil Richards, a law professor at Washington University in St. Louis.
‘If you want to talk about privacy, what would be less private than having a platoon of Redcoats living in your house, eating your food, listening to your conversations?" Richards asks. "... In the Constitution itself — the quartering of soldiers, the execution of general warrants — all have to do with the privacy of the home, the privacy of papers.
"And though the Constitution doesn't use the word 'privacy,' the separation of individuals and their information and their homes and their persons from the state is a theme that runs throughout the Bill of Rights.’” 


I have discussed privacy issues before – on this very blog on various occasions and have had people tell me in no uncertain terms, “To think the government is looking at YOU is the height of narcissism.  You’re not that important.”  While I may have a few healthy narcissistic tendencies, however, it is now a very well established fact that the NSA and the FBI think differently on the subject.  We are being monitored and that is a fact.  All of the sudden, my tinfoil collection doesn’t look so strange.  This “brave new world” which we find ourselves in did not just materialize out of thin air.  This is a systemic condition; it does not start or end with the executive branch.  None of this happens without the Legislative or the Judiciary branches of the United States government being aware of the widespread surveillance of the general populous in some capacity. 

I’ve heard the argument from several people, “Well, if you’re not doing anything wrong, so what?”  My concern is who is determining what is right and what is wrong?  As one administration bleeds into another what happens when the opinions of those in power shift – when our overlords are not so benevolent anymore?  I may have a differing opinion than the regime who has say over these nebulous / flexible terms of use that are NOT SUBJECT TO ANY LAWS.  What happens when my views on politics or religion are deemed a danger to the state and are now part of several data bases in the desert of Utah or in Langley Virginia?  Is there any ownership of my information or does it belong to a third party data aggregator who sells it to Lord knows who?

In the Reuters article, “Reports on Surveillance of Americans Fuel Debate Over Privacy, Security”, Diane Feinstein (Democratic Senator from California who heads the Senate Intelligence committee) is quoted as saying, “It’s called protecting America.”  Benjamin Franklin (Founding Father) is quoted as saying, “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”  Mark Hosenball & John Whitesides article can be found here: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/07/us-usa-wiretaps-verizon-idUSBRE95502920130607.    

Ben was like a Yoda that you would actually want to spend time with.

A CNET article by Declan McCullagh, “NSA spying flap extends to contents of U.S. phone calls”, states that, “National Security Agency discloses in secret Capitol Hill briefing that thousands of analysts can listen to domestic phone calls. That authorization appears to extend to e-mail and text messages too.”  The article quotes Mr. Kurt Opsahl.  “’…There are serious ‘constitutional problems’’ with this approach, said Kurt Opsahl, a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation who has litigated warrantless wiretapping cases. ‘It epitomizes the problem of secret laws.’”  Mr. McCullagh touches on the “NUCLEON” program where the NSA can take the spoken words from a phone call, convert it to text, and stores it all in a database.  The article can be found right here: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57589495-38/nsa-spying-flap-extends-to-contents-of-u.s-phone-calls/?ttag=fbwc.

Due to recent events there has been a spike in sales of a precautionary tale from George Orwell, entitled, “1984”.  As literary political fiction and dystopian science-fiction, Nineteen Eighty-Four is a classic novel in content, plot, and style. Many of its terms and concepts, such as Big Brother, doublethink, thoughtcrime, Newspeak, and memory hole, have entered everyday use since its publication in 1949. Moreover, Nineteen Eighty-Four popularized the adjective Orwellian, which describes official deception, secret surveillance, and manipulation of the past by a totalitarian or authoritarian state.”Oxford Companion to English Literature, Sixth Edition. University of Oxford Press: 2000. p. 726.  It is enjoying a resurgence in sales and is more relevant now than it ever has been.  See: “Orwell’s 1984 flying up the Amazon charts” right here: http://cir.ca/story/sales-of-1984-surge.

As the meme says, “It’s not supposed to be an instruction manual.”

The Guardian’s, Eric Limer wrote, “Meet Boundless Informant: the NSA Tool That Watches the Entire Planet”.  The Guardian published in the United Kingdom.  As the opening paragraph states, First there was PRISM—the network that’s collecting real-time data on people everywhere—and now The Guardian has turned up “Boundless Informant” which is indexing surveillance and espionage metadata from the ENTIRE WORLD.”  You can read all about it right here: http://htl.li/lR9sz.

So who is watching you?  Information has been used as currency for quite some time now.  Governments & corporations use it to sell ideologies, as well as, manufactured items to us all the time.  Slate’s Amy Webb published an article entitled, “Who’s Watching You? Not Just the NSA”.  In the article Ms. Webb explores the price that we pay when we choose to use new emerging technologies and participate in Social Media.  The reality is that we all live in clouds of deeply personal data, and we carry that information everywhere we go and in nearly everything we do. Stop for a moment, and think about all of the services you use and the conveniences you enjoy. Do you really think that Verizon is the only company divulging your information? Or that the NSA is the only organization doing the monitoring?  This article underlines an important factor that so many people ignore on a routine basis – actions & words mean things.  We pay the price for using our tech with information and when it’s out there – it’s out there.    “…There are serious social and legal repercussions when we allow a government or any organization unfettered, ubiquitous access to personal information. There are also serious repercussions when citizens don’t stop to think about the personal data they’re sharing, with whom and for what purpose. You may not be able to stop sharing that data, but you certainly can know what it is that you’re broadcasting.  You can find Amy Webb’s full article right here: http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2013/06/nsa_verizon_surveillance_you_re_sharing_your_private_data_all_the_time.html.  Click on the newly discovered Verizon commercial at the bottom of the article too.  Unfortunately, there is a lot of truth in humor.

Micah Lee’s article on the Electronic Frontier Foundation website goes into further depth as to how we are being followed.  Who picks up our electronic breadcrumbs when are on the web?  Or, more to the point, what happens when our information is farmed out to a third party data aggregator to anyone guess where?  …by loading third party resources from servers controlled by major providers like Facebook, Google, and others, are sending information about their visitors to companies subject to US government data requests. While these news companies themselves could directly receive requests for this data, the fact that they voluntarily send this data to the same small, centralized group of third parties makes these third parties convenient and attractive targets to collect visitor information from vast swaths of the web. Once a website sends data to a third party, it no longer has the power to stand up for its users against unconstitutional government requests for that data.”  How it happens and why it matters can be found right here: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/06/third-party-resources-nsa-leaks.  Again, this is nothing new – it is the price for participation and has been since the invention of the cookie in 2004.  Pay and play, it’s as simple as that.  If you want to reap the benefits of Social Media or using directions on your cell phone you must exchange information.   

What of Social Media of Facebook, Google, & Microsoft – how do they stand on this issue?  As per CBS news, “General Counsel Ted Ullyot said in a statement Friday that Facebook is only allowed to talk about total numbers, but is lobbying to reveal more, and the permission received is still unprecedented.

Following the guidelines, Ullyot says Facebook received between 9,000 and 10,000 requests from government entities in the last six months of 2012, on subjects from missing children to terrorist threats.

"With more than 1.1 billion monthly active users worldwide," said Ullyot, "this means that a tiny fraction of one percent of our user accounts were the subject of any kind of U.S. state, local, or federal U.S. government request (including criminal and national security-related requests) in the past six months. We hope this helps put into perspective the numbers involved, and lays to rest some of the hyperbolic and false assertions in some recent press accounts about the frequency and scope of the data requests that we receive."

In a rare alliance, Facebook, Google and Microsoft Corp. are pressuring the Obama administration to loosen their legal gag on government surveillance orders.  See: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-205_162-57589463/facebook-around-10k-requests-for-info-from-govt-in-last-6-months/ for full story.  Information is Social Media’s bread and butter.  These companies had to come forward in hopes that they would be viewed as being more transparent and that, as it says in the article, hoping that the Obama administration, “loosens their legal gag on government surveillance orders.”  They cannot afford to be lumped into any surveillance plot.  It’s just bad for business.   

So, whatever happened to doing the right thing?

A whistleblower as defined by Wikipedia (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistleblower) is, “…a person who exposes misconduct, alleged dishonest or illegal activity occurring in an organization. The alleged misconduct may be classified in many ways; for example, a violation of a law, rule, regulation and/or a direct threat to public interest, such as fraud, health and safety violations, and corruption. Whistleblowers may make their allegations internally (for example, to other people within the accused organization) or externally (to regulators, law enforcement agencies, to the media or to groups concerned with the issues).  What of the whistleblower – the often lone voice in the wilderness who stands up and does something?  The individual who is brave enough to do the right thing? 

Before the election are the promises to, “strengthen whistleblower laws” and are cited as, “Often the best source of information about waste, fraud, and abuse in government”.


After the election and the advent of Julian Assange & WikiLeaks, of Bradley Manning, and now Edward Snowden one can only conclude that we are being lied to on a sweeping - epic scale and on a routine basis.  The truth gets lost in the struggle to maintain power.  It is with profound sadness that I write those words.  “Obama will ensure that federal agencies expedite the process for reviewing whistleblower claims and whistleblowers have full access to courts and due process.”  How quaint.  The shame of it is I bought it – hook, line, & sinker.  I had “HOPE”.  It turns out truth and transparency are only words used to placate voters like me and things are not the same as it always was but with the endless march forward of technology and our innate ability to serve the darker angels of our own natures, things are much worse and there is no end in sight.  Our technology has outpaced our ethics.  We need to do better.  It’s that simple.

Where is Lucius Fox when we need him?     

Personal freedom.  Liberty.  America used to be known for these and, in some quarters, we still are.  Among our Rights as citizens is the First Amendment – the right to freedom of speech.  “Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Those words are found in our Declaration of Independence.  I have to believe that they still mean something.  In 2006 we were ranked 8th in personal freedoms (see; http://www.stateofworldliberty.org/index.html).  In 2013 (as per very similar data collection. See; http://patrickrhamey.com/saturday-research/2013/6/9/2013-state-of-world-liberty-index) The United States is not even in the top ten.

Let that sink in a bit.

We are not in the top ten.

Hong Kong is listed as third.  Perhaps this may have had some bearing on why Edward Snowden chose this as his initial base of operations?  I don’t know.  I do know; however, that the United States Department of Justice has now filed paperwork charging him with espionage (see: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/22/us-usa-security-snowden-charges-idUSBRE95K18220130622).  So much for all that “whistleblower protection” pre-election talk. 

I firmly believe that this the issue that will define the Obama Administration in the history books.  It cuts to the core of American ideology and speaks to our rights and our liberties.  The surveillance state which we live in did not just materialize into existence overnight; it was only brought into the light under this administration.  It is systemic and it could never have happened without all three branches of our government being aware or it to some degree.  Now we are aware of it too. As twenty-first century American citizens do we remain ambivalent and distracted waiting for the next wave of surveillance tools to be implemented (I’m looking at you, Drone fleet)?  What can we do?  I think it is a healthy practice to encourage transparency.  Further, I believe it sends the wrong message to United States citizens and to the rest of the world when we persecute a whistleblower.  I think it essential that we stand up for those who stood up for us - those who say, “This is wrong & it bad for others”.  Whistleblower protection is not only something that should put into policy but it should be lauded as a high watermark of a civilized society.  Doing the right thing to those who are trying to do the right thing speaks volumes about our ethics as a people and as a nation. 

Now that the inconvenient truth of the surveillance program is public knowledge politicians are starting to speak about it.  They must.  It cannot be avoided.  These are dangerous times (in several ways) and there must be a “balance” between defense & dystopia.  In the Politico, article entitled, “Nancy Pelosi Booed, Heckled at Netroots Nation 2013”, by Emily Schultheis (Emily Schultheis’ article is here: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/nancy-pelosi-booed-netroots-nation-2013-93193.html#.UcZ48iyO_Oo.twitter) we find Nancy Pelosi being booed and heckled when she used the word, “balance” trying to justify the warrantless surveillance of millions of American citizens during a speech.  One man yelled, “It’s not a balance.  It’s not constitutional!  No secret laws!”  As this man was ushered out of the hall by security a voice in the crowd said, “And that is what a police state looks like.”

My fear is that the voice in the crowd may be onto something.

We can do better.

We must.